Woodside Clinic
136 Jenkins Road N0E 1R0 Newport, ON, Canada

Listen to the experts- there is a safe way to have this technology. create a sanctuary in your home NOW!!!!!

https://www.researchgate.net//349518677_Review_of_scientif

PASSED Our motion’s success helps to ensure that Huawei will NOT be a part of Canada's 5G network!

"My biggest concern, as someone who has spent my whole life trying to avoid accidentally killing people, is that we don't end up using MAID for people who don't really want to die," Liberal MP and doctor, Marcus Powlowski.

We are living a lie, but it will catch up with us, with far worse consequences than COVID. We’re told COVID is the most devastating virus and a paramount dange...r that merits the uprooting of our way of life, and how we as people function and they are using force and threats to demand our compliance. Our very institutions, our governments and the media, which were designed to safeguard us, now shame and coerce us to accept the ever growing lie and to blindly accept the escalating inconsistencies we all witness in our daily lives. Just look at these graphs, less deaths this year than any of the last 5 years, all cause mortality has declined, average age of death continues to be those in their twilight years. All of these facts, not models, are verifiable data and published on government websites. Yet those who are making the decisions choose to ignore them. Are these facts congruent with a pandemic? If so, would we not see an increase in total deaths, or see greater numbers in deaths of young, healthy people after a year of a supposedly very dangerous, very contagious viral pandemic? The facts demonstrate we have been lied to, and those responsible have doubled down on their lie, destroying lives and society, to save themselves from embarrassment rather than admitting fault. We are living a lie and we have been betrayed, those who take part in the lie are complicit not virtuous. Source: https://www.jccf.ca/government-data-shows-lockdowns-more-d/ #onpoli #cdnpoli #nomorelockdowns

Action Alert We Need Our Conservation Authorities From the Canadian Environmental Law Association Scroll down for Environmental Defence, Rescue Lake Simcoe ...Coalition and others On November 5, 2020, the Ontario government tabled omnibus budget measures Bill 229 in the Ontario Legislature, Schedule 6 of which proposes fundamental changes to the Conservation Authorities Act and to the conservation authorities’ role in land use planning. Bill 229 is the most recent in a disturbing trend of using omnibus budget measures bills to make substantial changes to environmental laws, thereby sidestepping the public’s right to comment under the Environmental Bill of Rights. In CELA’s view, the proposed changes to conservation authorities in Bill 229 will not achieve the crucially important goal of building climate resilience for Ontario. To the contrary, the package of amendments as proposed are likely to set back watershed planning and implementation of an ecosystem based approach by decades. CELA recommends that Schedule 6 not be enacted in its present form and instead be withdrawn in its entirety from Bill 229. Further, CELA recommends that the Ontario government immediately seek to ensure that the current mandate of the province’s 36 conservation authorities is maintained and enhanced, in order to effectively protect, restore and manage the watersheds where 95 percent of the people of Ontario reside. We need our Conservation Authorities webinar CELA preliminary analysis of Schedule 6 of Bill 229 We Need Our Conservation Authorities Survey and Primer report Conservation Authorities need our help Call your MPP and ask them to drop Schedule 6 from the budget bill From Environmental Defence Conservation Authorities keep our environment safe. Now the Ontario Government is gutting them. The Ontario government has just launched an all-out attack on Ontario’s protected forests and wetlands. Hidden in their latest budget Bill is a clause that will take away any control over the protection of our precious wetlands, forests, wildlife habitat and natural spaces from Conservation Authorities, and give huge new powers to developers to push through destructive projects. Worse, by sneaking through these changes buried in a budget bill, the government is avoiding public consultation that is normally required on laws that impact the environment. That’s why we need every MPP to hear about this so that they push to remove schedule 6, which guts Conservation Authorities, from the budget Bill. Conservation Authorities are a vital line of defence for the natural spaces that mitigate flood risk, provide precious land for hiking, fishing and escape into nature and provide essential habitat for the many species of wildlife, including endangered species that call Ontario home. If we lose these spaces, we can’t get them back. Key talking points for your call: 1. Introduce yourself (let them know that you are a constituent). 2. Ask them to remove Schedule 6 from Bill 229 (Ontario budget bill) and protect Ontario’s wetlands and forests. 3. Tell them Schedule 6 only benefits developers. 4. Explain why protecting Ontario’s wetlands and forests are important to you and your community. 5. Thank them, and remember to leave your contact information and request they return your call. You will most likely just be leaving a message, so asking to speak to someone in person is very powerful. Go to the ED page to connect easily with your MPP Changes to Conservation Authorities Act are irresponsible and unjustified Ford government eviscerates CA powers putting environment and property at risk From Rescue Lake Simcoe Coalition Lake Simcoe, Ontario Last week the province of Ontario snuck changes to Conservation Authorities’ (CAs) powers into their budget bill, which could be passed without consultation as early as next week. The proposed changes are widely regarded by the environmental community as a vindictive stab at the environment and CAs led by the Premier’s Office. Critics argue that these changes will undermine the effectiveness of CAs. Additionally these changes will add costs and red tape for both the CAs and those seeking development permits in lands now regulated by CAs. The proposed changes include: -Creating a mechanism for the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry to use his/her opinion to override the science-based decisions of Conservation Authorities regarding the protection of wetlands, woodlands, endangered species habitats and flood protection; -Forcing Conservation Authority Board members to generally act on behalf of their respective municipalities instead of the goals and objectives of the Conservation Authority and the watershed health it was entrusted to protect; and -Tangle up permitting processes while providing appeal rights for developers, and adding red tape and costs for all involved. Conservation Authorities have professionally trained staff, including ecologists and hydrologists, who are best qualified to understand the impacts of development on key environmental features. By taking over control to authorize or deny development permits, the Ontario government will help the development industry continue to destroy key forests, wetlands, and recreational areas across the province. This will allow, for example, the province to ensure the destruction of the coastal wetland in Lower Duffins Creek to proceed despite the objection of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Town of Ajax and thousands of citizens’ objections. The Rescue Lake Simcoe Coalition’s Executive Director, Claire Malcolmson, was invited to participate in the province’s public consultation on Conservation Authorities, and did not hear an overwhelming call for the radical changes advanced by the Province. The Province has not released details on how they made the CA Act change proposal in relation to the comments received in their public consultation process. This is where an independent Environmental Commissioner of Ontario would have been helpful, but eliminating the independence of that position was one of the first attacks on the environment completed by this provincial administration. Despite promises in the Made in Ontario Environment Plan, these changes will have negative effects on water quality, natural area protection, and will make us more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change including heavy rain and flooding events. The proposed changes put downstream homeowners at greater risk of flooding, as the permitting and oversight powers of CA’s in the planning process have been gutted, says Malcolmson. The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) has developed leading-edge policies and programs that help to minimize the significant impacts of development on water quality, which were enabled by the Lake Simcoe Protection Act, but not acted on by the Province. Developers are for the most part doing their part to participate and are thereby reducing harm to Lake Simcoe as compared to a pre-Lake Simcoe Protection Plan scenario. The LSRCA has also developed an exceptional Natural Heritage and Restoration Strategy, a key tool in achieving the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan’s natural heritage protection targets. If the LSRCA is changed in the ways proposed by the Province, no regulator will be taking care of Lake Simcoe. Changes to Conservation Authorities Act Trigger Red Flags for Conservation Ontario from Conservation Ontario November 6 2020 Conservation Ontario and the conservation authorities (CAs) are reviewing the Province’s changes to the Conservation Authorities Act (CA Act) which were released in the 2020 Ontario Budget yesterday. There are a number of changes that we feel could have significant impact on conservation authorities, and on their watershed management responsibilities, said Kim Gavine, General Manager of Conservation Ontario (CO). Conservation Ontario is the association which represents Ontario’s 36 conservation authorities. The CA Act has been under review by the Province since April 2019. Earlier this year, the Minister of Environment, Parks and Conservation (MECP) hosted a series of five consultation meetings across the province with invited representatives primarily from municipalities, conservation authorities and agriculture, landowner and development sectors. Conservation Ontario was a presenter at these sessions. There are a number of changes that could actually create more red tape and delay permit application approvals and I’m not sure that’s what the Province intended to do, Gavine pointed out. Over the past two years, CO has been working with CAs, the development sector and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) to develop better streamlined client service approaches for CAs to use when reviewing plan review and permit applications. The initiative has been well-received and is ongoing. As well, changes have been made to the planning role for conservation authorities which could actually put more people at threat, rather than protect them from natural hazards. One of our main goals throughout this review has been to maintain the conservation authorities’ watershed- based approach to protecting people from natural hazards and ensuring the conservation of Ontario’s natural resources. Some of the changes will impact the CAs’ ability to do so, Gavine said. Some of the other changes included in yesterday’s budget bill (Bill 229) are around new rules for CA Board appointments, scoping of non-mandatory programs and services, and creation of new Ministerial powers. If nothing else, pandemic conditions this year have certainly reinforced how much we rely on a healthy environment for our own well-being, Gavine said. It’s important that conservation authorities are able to continue to protect our natural environment and ensure the safety of Ontario residents. The 2020 Ontario budget accelerates attacks on the environment on behalf of special interests from Environmental Defence November 6 2020 Legal changes hidden in the budget show the Ontario government is accelerating its attack on the environment on behalf of developer and industry interests at the expense of the public and future generations. Proposed changes include: -Creating a mechanism to override the science-based decisions of Conservation Authorities regarding the protection of wetlands, woodlands, endangered species habitats and flood protection -Permanent exemption of the forest industry from compliance with the Endangered Species Act The Ontario government is busy taking apart 75 years of progress in preventing and mitigating the impacts of flooding, preserving forests, wetlands and protecting our sources of clean drinking water, said Tim Gray, Executive Director of Environmental Defence. Replacing the science-based decisions of Conversation Authorities with political ones that serve developer interests is a recipe for disaster. Conservation Authorities have professionally trained staff, including ecologists and hydrologists, who are best placed to understand the impacts of development on key environmental features. By taking over control to authorize or deny development permits, the Ontario government will help the development industry continue to destroy key forests, wetlands, and recreational areas across the province. This will allow, for example, the province to ensure the destruction of the coastal wetland in Lower Duffins Creek to proceed over the objection of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Town of Ajax and thousands of citizens objections. Similarly, the province’s further gutting of protection for endangered species is a long sought goal of the forest industry, as it continues to extirpate woodland caribou from Ontario’s boreal forest. Now the forest industry will be free to ignore the plight of woodland caribou and other species that are threatened with extinction or extirpation, said Tim Gray. These proposed changes will be exempt from public consultation because they are contained in a budget bill.

GREAT NEWS! The state of government of Bavaria, Germany has created a homeopathy department within the Ministry of Health! The report has an English translation under the initial German report. https://homoeopathiewatchblog.de//bayern-baut-als-erstes/

Our actions and words opposing government overreach are working. Parm Gill, MPP and MPP Jane McKenna are now representing their constituents and have rejected t...he Premier's rule of fear and intimidation. This is happening due to the many calls, letters and emails from concerned people. Don't stop! Together we can end this authoritarian reign and regime. Just as LTC Minister Dr. Fullerton proclaimed COVID is comparable to "a bad flu season", the dam has broken more MPPs will mutiny and create a truly representative caucus that respects constituents Contact the Premier, your MP, MPP, and local council. Premier: [email protected] or [email protected] or 416-325-1941 Find Your MPP: https://www.ola.org/en/members

Possibly my last essay on the subject by way of a farewell to common sense. How the COVID 19 event has warped the perception of health. Health is a state of com...plete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. The World Health Organisation developed the above definition of health shortly after World War Two and it has endured well. Although health propaganda has often been a tool of deception and abuse, 2020 must surely be remembered as the year when this moto was totally abandoned, not only by the WHO, but also by government health advisors across the globe. Health politics lost any pretence of a wholistic view and abandoned all hope of common sense in favour of ‘drug’ induced COVID scare mongering. Pharmaceutical industry funding is such a significant source of income to research, health advisory bodies, health services and the WHO itself that, together with its media influence, it has warped any true pursuit of public health into promotion of drugs, testing and vaccines. It seems only a short while ago that people in Britain were so vociferous in their insistence that we would never sell our National Health Service to private organisations. I’m afraid it was taken over a long time ago by anyone rich enough to sponsor and fund in a climate of continuing cuts and erosion by Government. He who pays the piper calls the tune. And what an ingenious brain washing tune it has been. Advisory bodies across the globe that were supposedly set up to promote public health spent a disproportionate amount of time promoting social manipulation techniques. Only the pharmaceutical industries hymn singers were allowed any voice. Any doctors, scientists and other professionals that opposed their message were denied any media coverage. Any protests against the draconian COVID controls were either given media silence or media ridicule. Classic brainwashing techniques were used with repetitive slogans, fear inducement, public demonstrations of clapping, denial of basic freedoms and enforcement of pointless rules. Anyone who questioned the fear mongering was labelled as selfish and uncaring. George Orwell would have recognised these techniques, as well as the encouragement to report your family, friends and neighbours for breaking the rules. In fact, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and many other brutal dictators have used the same techniques. I have been ardently sceptical of the COVID pandemic since it was first put forward as an idea. That does not make me uncaring. I sympathise deeply with anyone who has experienced severe illness or death of loved ones regardless of what has caused those conditions. Some deaths and illness that have been labelled COVID related may even have been caused by such a condition, but nowhere near the majority of them. So, what is causing the COVID mirage? It is doubtful that it is any one thing, but a convergence of several effects and intentions. COVID control doubters are often labelled as conspiracy theorists sometimes by those who deliberately wish to discredit them and often by people who do not actually understand the significance of the term in everyday life. Conspiracies are a normal mechanism of society wherever groups of people get together to make decisions. Some conspiracies are bad, often created by self-interested individuals and others have done good and have been supported in the interest of efficiency and the best of intentions. No one who has ever served on a council, a committee, a board or some other governing or guiding body can deny the existence of conspiracies and have probably, even if only in a small way, taken part in them. It should come as no surprise then that, if the world’s health research and advisory bodies are so heavily financed by the pharmaceutical industry, with some individuals openly admitting their involvement in that industry, the advice being put forward is going to be heavily biased towards testing, drugs and vaccines to the detriment of other good infection control and public health measures. Flock mentality has always been the enemy of open-minded debate. It is the root of blind extremism in many aspects of society and can march under such diverse banners as religion and science as well as politics, sport and celebrity hero worship. In the COVID debate it has obstructed reasonable progress on both sides of the argument. The faith of the pro COVIDs will cause them to blindly believe the official media drip feed, regardless of how obviously ludicrous that information is compared to their own personal experience. The anti COVIDs also have the habitual group members, chanters and activists getting in the way of reason. On both sides, those who present reasonable, moderate arguments are drowned out by the mob. The vociferous mob on both sides will obscure reasoned argument by their loud and repetitive criticism of the other. The resultant population becomes perfect for brain washing even further into their extreme stance. Interestingly, both sides commonly refer to the other as sheep. Entrenchment is partly a result of the flock mentality effect but also a natural human condition in its own right. ‘Once I have put all the effort into digging this trench or building this castle, I am damn well going to stay in it and defend it no matter what new information I am presented with.’ This has happened throughout history. It was certainly a major feature of the First World War, where the insanity of the events became apparent to most decision makers at the early stages, but the ironic momentum of inertia prevented logic from stopping it. Strangely, it took a real and devastating pandemic to finally help bring it to an end. Entrenchment seems to cripple any attempt to consider the COVID phenomena reasonably. Shaming, like bullying, is a product of flock behaviour. It can sometimes be dressed as the sarcastic wit of a clever individual but even the most original commentators would rarely waste their talents on a non-receptive audience. Shaming is what makes the bulk of people comply with COVID controls they know are ridiculous because they don’t want to stand out and be criticised. It creates acceptance of a norm we know to be inherently wrong. More powerful still is the cultivated guilt complex that is designed to make any critic of the COVID control measures feel that they are being disrespectful of those who have lost or suffered due to the apparent infection. You can imagine those who first complained about the criminal abuse activities of Jimmy Saville being told not to rock the boat because they would undermine all the benefits of being associated with such a do-gooding celebrity. Who knows, perhaps the same was true of Jack the Ripper. Shaming is infectious. It might be a more common tool of the pro COVID lobby, with such ludicrous statements as ‘Your not wearing a mask is killing my grandmother!’, but it is used by the anti COVIDs as well. Fear is, of course, a great motivator. It was a declared intention of government advisory groups on COVID almost from their inception. Fearful people are easier to make compliant. Some are genuinely fearful of the disease due to the extreme scare tactics of the media reporting on it. More commonly, people are afraid of the penalties for breaking the COVID rules. To their credit, the least fearful seem to be the elderly, who often have a far more common-sense approach to the whole issue than many. Their wish for freedom and company far exceeds fear of death and yet we hold them in solitary confinement for the last years of their life. Testing and statistics are the storm troopers of the draconian COVID control promoters. Unfortunately, the testing is so floored as to be useless and the statistics are so misleading as to be almost outright lies. In simple terms, the testing most commonly used on people for COVID 19 does not actually test for COVID 19. It tests for a group of micro biological particles commonly found to be associated with the COVID 19 condition. Unfortunately, the same particles are also associated with a number of other conditions and make no distinction between active or dead organisms. Even the inventor of the test stated that it was not suitable for the identification of infectious organisms in the way it is being used. The COVID 19 event is certainly not the first time statistics have been grossly manipulated to deliberately create a false image. In fact, it is very hard for even the most diligent statistician to produce results that don’t have a bias. From the early stages, death statistics were exaggerated by recording all deaths as COVID where a positive test was obtained at any time before death regardless of the actual cause. This meant that car crash fatalities were often recorded as COVID deaths as well as those caused by many diverse illnesses. Originally doctors were not even required to have any evidence of COVID like infection as a cause; they could record COVID as a cause just because they thought it might be. This has continued to the present day with the current published COVID death numbers including anyone who has tested positive for COVID in the last 28 days, again regardless of the actual cause of death. The statistics are also muddled due to the use of the term ‘cases’ to give a false impression that the incidence of the disease is greater than it is. Cases are not illnesses they simply represent positive test results, some of which are multiplied several times because of multiple tests of the same person. This would give a false impression even if the tests were reliable; given that they are grossly inaccurate with a high number of false positives the statistics are worse than useless. Death statistics have unfortunately always had their own built in inaccuracies which have been deliberately taken advantage of by those who would have us believe that COVID is more significant than it is. Most people in the developed world are sheltered from the reality, vagueness and complexity of death. We are happy to leave such matters to doctors, nurses and undertakers and generally would not dream of questioning the cause of death. It is only when some of the records of death become so ridiculous such as in the current COVID event that more people begin to question them. It is no coincidence that the world is experiencing an unprecedented number of complaints and challenges regarding death certificates and coroners’ reports. I suppose it is natural for a media indoctrinated population to think that post-mortem examinations are as thorough as they see on detective programmes whereas, in reality, they are nothing like them. This, in itself, is not necessarily a fault as long as the uncertainty is honestly reported but it often isn’t and the political pressure to put COVID as a cause makes matters even worse. The post-mortem world is not what most people think it is. Its origins are firmly based on distinguishing between a natural death and an unnatural one for legal reasons. Unnatural deaths will then be given the full process of careful evidence collection for the purpose of prosecution and defence scrutiny and argument whereas the cause of a natural death will often be seen by the professional involved as an academic nicety of limited importance. A high degree of accuracy for most natural death post-mortems is likely to only be achieved where research or education is involved in the process. This vagueness is even more the case where no formal post-mortem is required for the creation of a death certificate. As stated earlier, this educated guess work is not necessarily wrong, as long as it is honest. Nobody generally complained in the days when death reports and certificates used such general terms as pneumonia, heart failure, oedema, infarcts and the like. The problem occurs when politics and sometimes financial incentive forces a doctor’s hand to record a specific infective cause that they are not certain of. The economics of COVID are an illusion all of their own and the true costs remain hidden to many by slight of hand, but here I will address their influence on the pandemic illusion. In many parts of the world the population was bribed to stay at home. Who is going to question too deeply when they are paid to do nothing? Those who would normally struggle into work with illness now had the luxury of taking advantage of as many paid isolation opportunities as possible. People clamoured to have a go at the test lottery in the hope of a financially secure holiday. For some, because of the costs of getting to work, they were better off staying at home. Few were prepared to rock this very lucrative boat by saying ‘Where is this pandemic, then?’ Add to this the financial incentives offered to many through social media to take part in ‘testing research’, where they were tested multiple times with each positive recorded as a separate ‘case’ despite often being symptomless. Some employers also insisted on multiple testing, again pushing up the false case rate. And then we had test and trace, encouraging more people to test with a guarantee of income if they have to isolate. Up went the numbers of ‘cases’ again. Employment is for most people fundamental to their financial stability and the threat of that employment being withdrawn or progress being hampered is enough for many professionals to not comment on their serious doubts about the COVID controls. This is certainly the case in the National Health Service and also I imagine, in the hospitals around the world. Questioning the official line or refusing to falsify the reports concerning cause of death has resulted in disciplinary action for doctors and nurses and in some cases, suspension. It would take a brave employee with a mortgage and a family to support to stand up against the corruption. Even very senior doctors and scientists risk their reputation being damaged by standing up against the mainstream propaganda. Financial incentive to create research bias is not new and it has existed in the health field for as long as I can remember. Research is expensive and it is not unusual for private funding to pay for it. The bias is created in a number of ways. The sponsor can simply state quite clearly what they are expecting the research to prove and all funding will be tied to that objective. If researchers wander too far of the prescribed path their funding simply dries up. Guess who the successful researchers are in this model. Alternatively, researchers may appear to have more of a free hand, but still be given a clear idea of what the sponsors interests are and what results will attract grants for further research. Even if they are free to research along any path, the researchers still have to get their work published and the gatekeepers to both mainstream and professional media outlets are often the same sponsors. Free thinking researchers on COVID do exist and are highly critical of the scare tactics but they are silenced or ridiculed by the mainstream media. Apart from the financial and ownership controls on the media creating an exaggerated COVID risk miasma the nature of media itself creates sensationalism. The press rarely lets the truth get in the way of a good story and scaring people sells more copy than boring reassurance. The COVID illusion has also been enforced by some of the most draconian actions by officers of the law. I have been appalled at how the police that I respect have themselves been forced to enforce unfair, dangerous and probably ultra vires government requirements. Add to this the special units of bullies dressed as riot police that the British Government has created and we have all the makings of a police state. The Home Secretary has now even taken away the right to protest, a cornerstone of democracy. Even when protests were legal, I personally witnessed the riot police attack a totally peaceful and submissive crowd that had gathered to hear learned speeches questioning the COVID controls. In the same attack a well-respected doctor who had just started his speech was arrested and held for over 24 hours. Finally, I must list exhaustion as one of the reasons that the COVID illusion is so strong. Those who promote the excessive COVID controls and exaggerate the significance of the condition in the interest of furthering highly profitable pharmaceutical solutions have all the machinery and finance of governments at their disposal. Their vast collective wealth can buy any illusion of reality they wish people to swallow. Their objectors are people with relatively scarce resources and can be worn down and removed easily. The ‘thought police’ play on our emotional and mental sensitivities at the same time as suppressing any objectors’ messages. It is very tiring. In conclusion, the global COVID hysteria is creating tunnel vision in health management. Health promotion and wellbeing are being ignored. Mental illness, domestic violence and suicide are increasing. Non COVID illnesses are going undetected and untreated. In short, the COVID controls have caused more suffering and death than the COVID condition ever could. The world must return to the promotion of health in its widest sense and abandon the ridiculous and damaging COVID scaremongering that it has become addicted to. Peter Phillips. MCIEH Environmental Health Consultant. 19thNovember 2020 See more

Predictions for 2030 by people shaping the world At the World Economic Forum in Davos, the elite of the elite gather to hatch plans for the future of the planet.... I asked some of this year’s participants to tell me one thing they think will happen by 2030 that most people don’t realize. THIS IS NOTHING NEW, UNFORTUNATELY. GLOBAL ELITE BILLIONAIRES DOING EXPERIMENTS IN AFRICA https://www.technologyreview.com//predictions-2030-people/

Here are my closing statements from Wednesday’s gathering to those standing for freedom in defiance of the unlawful #COVID19 laws in Ontario. We tested the law,... and the Premier demonstrated he’s all bluster, no muster. His government knows that their COVID laws are unjust. Let that be a message to every free person in Ontario, that you must not fear the undemocratic decrees of this government and its COVID Command Table. When we have stood together in support of freedom and responsibility, we have won. We will win again. I encourage everyone to continue challenging these unlawful COVID rules and put an end to the cure that is worse than the disease. Thank you to everyone who came out. #FordFailedThePeople #onpoli

Sky News host Rowan Dean says the next World Economic Forum in Davos has morphed from a jet-setter climate gabfest into a sinister anti-democratic enterprise designed to destroy your job, steal your prosperity and rob your kids of a future.

Dr. Jeff Barke: The fatality rate for young people is way below that of influenza if you're under 25, you're 50 times more at risk to die from drowning than COVID-19.

https://twitter.com/fatemperor/status/1320661007128240128

No one talks about these stats! Just meaningless cases going up!

While there are those who have cause to celebrate and give thanks today, our government has caused many to have little reason to celebrate, with the closure of ...thousands of businesses. As a Ford Cabinet Minister announces that COVID ‘is much like a bad flu season’, Public Health Ontario elicits panic, screaming the alarm bells are ringing and we must lockdown. How can both these statements be true? Watch my video and learn of many COVID contradictions that expose either incompetence or malfeasance. Who is in charge of our democracy? Is it our elected government, or the unelected health bureaucrats? What is becoming increasingly clear to all those who are thinking critically, is that lockdowns have become the religion and ideology of health bureaucrats, while science, evidence, and common sense has been masked and suffocated. All this at the cost of the freedom, justice, and democracy we all hold so dear? It is time we stand up and speak out. Sign my two petitions to stop a second lockdown and against mandatory masking. Contact your local representatives & let them know what you think of more lockdowns. Together we will return to normal. Let’s all work together so that we can all celebrate and give thanks, and end these lockdowns. No Lockdowns: https://www.randyhilliermpp.com/petition_nolockdown No Mandatory Masking: https://www.randyhilliermpp.com/petition_facemasks

This chart goes back to Spring 2020. This was the modelling they used in order to justify the first lockdown. It illustrates the measures taken and shows best c...ase scenario (aprox 1200 ICU patients with the virus). It only ended up being around 250 patients. In the SECOND WAVE!!!! omg! there are currently only 47 people in ICU with covid (out of 15 million lol). Most hospitals are just fine. Some are slightly busier than normal because all of the cancelled surgeries in anticipation for a wave that never fully came created a backlog. This still wont stop Dr. Hirji from threatening our businesses and families. It wont stop the government from expecting your neighbours to rat on you at Christmas if they see too many cars in your driveway. It wouldnt surprise me if we are threatened like this every winter moving forward. The ridiculous rules (bars cant serve booze after 11pm) and the stupid lockdowns and restrictions in areas when people will just drive 20 minutes to find gyms, salons etc....this will never stop because we have allowed it to happen. History shows that government does not let go of such power. numbers>feelings

ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION...IS IT "VERY RARE?" On June 8, 2020, the WHO's Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, stated that asymptomatic transmission of Covid-19 was "very ra...re," based on findings from "very detailed" contract tracing studies. The next day on June 9, 2020, however, she backpedaled, and the mainstream media quickly reported that asymptomatic spread was, in fact, more common. Dr. Kerkhove apparently did not include data from "models" that "estimated" asymptomatic spread "may" have accounted for up to 40% of Covid-19 transmission. Should the reliable findings of detailed observational patient studies be supplanted by hypothetical data from mathematical models? What has happened to science? This about face has ramifications on global health policies around the world, as fear of infection more deeply grips people and fuels the current demand for mandatory mask orders now seen in many countries. Transcripts of Dr. Kerkhove from both days: June 8, 2020 "What proportion of asymptomatic individuals actually transmit [Covid-19]? So the way that we look at that...these individuals need to be followed carefully over the course of when they're detected and looking at secondary transmission. We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They're following asymptomatic cases. They're following contacts, and they're not finding secondary transmission onward. It's very rare. And much of that is not published in the literature. From the papers that are published, there's one that came out from Singapore looking at a long-term care facility. There are some household transmission studies, where you follow individuals over time, and you look at the proportion of those that transmit onwards. We are constantly looking at this data, and we're trying to get more information from countries to truly answer this question. It still appears to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward." June 9, 2020 "What I didn't report yesterday was...because there's so many unknowns around this, some modeling groups tried to estimate: what is the portion of asymptomatic people that may transmit? And these are estimates. And there's a big range from the different models...some estimates of around 40% of transmission may be due to asymptomatic. But those are from models. And so I didn't include that in my answer yesterday."

**EDIT: (Oct 16, 2020) TO THE FACT CHECKERS- I never once said on this post that masks were ineffective nor that mask increase infection rates; those are YOUR w...ords, NOT MINE & frankly a defamation of my character. But just the mere fact that you had to put words in my mouth to supposedly "fact check" my post, certainly shows that there's NOT MUCH CREDITBILITY IN YOUR FACT CHECKING. The FACTS (FROM CDC) ARE SIMPLY STATED BELOW, and people are to come to their OWN CONCLUSIONS. BTW, masks do cause increased infections and are NOT effective, but we'll save that for another post. ** _____________________________________________ From the CDC on mask wearing habits of those who contract Covid-19: Those who get SICK with COVID19: 70.6% Wear a mask ALWAYS. 3.9% NEVER wear a mask. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6936a5-H.pdf pg 4

Who Knew how much it meant to us? We’ll never take you for granted again! The Carol Burnett Show

https://vimeo.com/399733860 Very good to listen to Stay safe

Natural sources of vitamin c are raw fruits and veggies. Red pepper, cantaloupes, cabbage citrus fruits etc. But i would check in with a naturopathic doctor if you have any intestinal issues because the raw fruits and veggies may aggravate your digestive tract.

I like this. Now we just need the bike paths to expand everywhere.

This is interesting. Mesenchyme the area between the cells. This is what naturopathic doctors constantly try to clean and remove metabolic waste from using herbal, homeopathic, acupuncture, hydrotherapy etc. Maybe the bridge can be finally seen by more patients between mainstream medicine and traditional medicine. Liz Liz

So much trash in the ocean! We can do better.

Join us on Wednesday October 11 for Gutsy & Glowing - Gut & Brain health seminar. Learn about the ancient tradition of fermented food for brains, beauty and boosts of energy! $20.00 *Opportunity to take home their very own fermentation kit at an additional cost. Please call the clinic to register: 519.484.999

Join us for a make and take workshop where you will learn about the world of essential oils and leave with your very own roll-on. Workshop cost: $10.00 Please call the clinic to register: 519.484.999

Shaeri Richards interviews Ananda More on the Making of Magic Pills

Enjoy the Best Ab Exercises by Science with Demo and Explanations by Dr. Stu McGill, Spine Biomechanics

Introducing DRUIDE Hair Care & Body Products! ECOCERT organic certified products. Makers of make non-toxic hygiene and beauty products that respect the human body and the earth. DRUIDE products contain: *No chemical preservatives *No petroleum products... *No artificial fragrances *No ethoxylated products *No glycol *No artificial colors *No GMOs *No added estrogen or sulfate Furthermore, they guarantee the complete absence of synthetic molecules (eg. petrochemicals) and the complete absence of animal composites. Only milk, honey and wax are permitted. Stop in at the clinic and choose to purchase from a variety of hair and body products. See more

Are you tired, sick or fatigued? IV therapy also referred to as nutrient therapy involves delivering high doses of vitamins, minerals, amino acids and anti-oxidants directly into the bloodstream. This approach allows for the rapid absorption of nutrients in order to provide effective relief of symptoms. IV therapy provides patients with essential nutrients to provide energy, improve cellular function, enhance recovery and boost immunity. This can also help reduce the side effects and improve the quality of treatment people receive when undergoing conventional cancer treatments and other aggressive conventional therapies. Inquire about Intravenous Therapy and enhance your overall well being!

SALE Right now receive 25% off of ALL ~ Dr. Meso and Eminence Skin Products ~ These products are all organic! Hurry in and stock up now, items are on sale while supplies last!!!

Are you suffering from chronic pain, shingles or non-healing ulcers? Conditions treated with MLS Laser Therapy are: Arthritis and Bursitis, Backache and sciatica, Rotator Cuff Tendonititis, Neck and shoulder Injuries, Repetitive Motion Injuries, Hip, Knee and Lumbar Pain, Achilles Tendonitits, Epicondylitis, Occupational Injuries, Sprains and Strains, Sports Injuries, Heel and Foot Pain. Contraindications may apply, contact us for information today!

We are pleased to welcome once again to the clininc Dr. Farah Mirzaagha ND. Dr. Farah is here on Thursdays only. She is accepting new patients and also provides Bowen Therapy for pain management.

Pumpkin detox facial is perfect for dry or dehydrated, loose, wrinkled or devitalized skin types. The pumpkin enzymes smooth out wrinkles and fine lines while hydrating water deficient skin. The antioxidant effects of oranges and grapes protect the skin from premature signs of aging. The Hungarian paprika along with grape and pumpkin promote collagen and firming while paprika adds a stimulating detoxifying effect. This treatment is for women over 45 years old who would benefit from this 1 a week for 4 weeks to create that deeper replenishing effect. The promotion is for 115 for the month of october valued at 150. Bring a second person to have the treatment at 1/2 the price. Really fun and relaxing. In Health liz

Ozone low dose concept is a therapy used at the clinic for improving micro-circulation as in diabetic legs and circulation to the eyes, for regulating the immune system as in viral infections hepatitis and shingles, for decreasing the inflammation in the body in arthritis and cancer. see ozone therapy in the website for more information...the therapy has international standards of treatment that are used at the clinic. www.woodsideclinic.com/ozone-therapy/